Top Tweets for Dreeben on Twitter.

Search results for Dreeben

Helen Dreeben @HelenDreeben

3 hours ago

@SuskindHagar @DonaldJTrumpJr But if I create the content will you help me get it out?

1 0 0 12 0

Helen Dreeben @HelenDreeben

3 hours ago

@SuskindHagar @DonaldJTrumpJr I’m doing everything in my power to convince people, especially Jews, to vote Trump. The democrats simply hate Israel and hate Jews.

1 0 1 19 0

Helen Dreeben @HelenDreeben

10 hours ago

@Strandjunker You apparently haven’t looked out the window

0 0 0 12 0

Helen Dreeben @HelenDreeben

10 hours ago

@SenSanders I’d really love to see you truly support their efforts by also going on a hunger strike.

0 0 1 139 0

Helen Dreeben @HelenDreeben

11 hours ago

@DonaldJTrumpJr @SuskindHagar It’s too cheesy to repost. I could do a lot better than that.

1 0 0 29 0

@JeanneKnudsen @RonBrownstein How? Her final question to Sauer was terrible. It had no basis on caselaw. It was disjointed and I like her. It was terrible and Dreeben was terrible. Gorsuch destroyed Dreeben immediately. No one knows corrupt intent means.

0 0 0 2 0

Anna @AnnaNyc6

11 hours ago

@RonBrownstein Dreeben

0 0 0 2 0

Armando @ArmandoNDK

16 hours ago

I think Dreeben took the entirely wrong tack on the SCOTUS oral argument in the Trump immunity argument. But I won’t claim victory because SCOTUS screws Smith on the trial delay. There’s no knowing what was the best course. We don’t get 2 realities to see.

0 0 7 616 0

Helen Dreeben @HelenDreeben

18 hours ago

@Villgecrazylady @BonsaiSky Hard to believe. It’s well documented that the ProHamas/palestinian protests are full of hate and tear down the American 🇺🇸 but the Israeli supports wear the American 🇺🇸 on their backs proudly. Jews support, love and cherish our country. The campus protestors despise it. But…

1 0 1 84 0

Helen Dreeben @HelenDreeben

19 hours ago

@sarahslavin @arneduncan @ChiPubSchool @ByronSigcho @UChicago Sarah - seriously? When are you dems going to learn that the party you so loyally and vehemently embrace seeks the destruction of Israel, Jews and eventually the US. We’ve been seeing this for years. How many times did Obama invite Farrakhan to the White House? And sadly,…

1 0 1 90 0

Helen Dreeben @HelenDreeben

21 hours ago

@GadSaad @JustinTrudeau @francoislegault Yup - Montreal was a beautiful city once. Just returned for the total eclipse and was dismayed at how low morale was. But Schwartz deli cheered me up

0 0 1 7 0

Helen Dreeben @HelenDreeben

21 hours ago

@AynReagan Have the campuses been turning off their sprinkler systems?

0 0 3 9 0

Helen Dreeben @HelenDreeben

a day ago

@GadSaad But Schwartz Deli still thrives. 😋

0 0 27 20K 0

Helen Dreeben @HelenDreeben

a day ago

@persianjewess Don’t answer this. Keep them guessing

0 0 4 67 0

PeriodicTweet @PeriodicTweet

a day ago

@alegalnerd @marty_lederman @aweissmann_ @RickPildes @aweissmann @jacklgoldsmith @rgoodlaw @rickhasen @ElectionLawBlog 4/4 Dreeben arguably conceded this point (even though said this in context of communications w/Congress)? Maybe obvious all were office-seeking, but SCOTUS (Chutkan?) still needs to say so. x.com/PeriodicTweet/…

PeriodicTweet @PeriodicTweet

a week ago

2 0 0 374 0

Download Image

1 0 2 179 0

PeriodicTweet @PeriodicTweet

a day ago

@alegalnerd @marty_lederman @aweissmann_ @RickPildes @aweissmann @jacklgoldsmith @rgoodlaw @rickhasen @ElectionLawBlog 2/4 While SC thinks can bring at least 1 charge based on private, still needs Court to say that. E.g. Sauer 1st appeared to concede fake electors but then clawed it back. x.com/PeriodicTweet/… Dreeben told Barrett he needs the Court to say fake electors scheme private.

PeriodicTweet @PeriodicTweet

a week ago

1 0 3 209 0

Download Image

1 0 3 146 0

Download Image

Marty Lederman @marty_lederman

2 days ago

@aweissmann_ @RickPildes @aweissmann @jacklgoldsmith @rgoodlaw @rickhasen @ElectionLawBlog Thus the only issue before the Court is whether DOJ can also prosecute for official-capacity acts. Dreeben's point about using official-capacity acts as *evidence* is only a fallback argument *if* the Court were to hold that they can't be the basis for culpability.